Who Qualifies for Whistleblower Protection Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 offers critical protections for employees who report corporate fraud and misconduct. Understanding who qualifies for these protections is essential for potential whistleblowers. Here’s a detailed look at the qualifications under SOX.

Who Qualifies for Protection?

To qualify for whistleblower protection under SOX, an individual must satisfy several key criteria:

  1. Employment Status: The whistleblower must be an employee of a “covered company.” This includes publicly traded companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, nationally recognized statistical rating organizations, and officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents of such entities. It’s important to note that this definition is quite broad, encompassing not only current employees but also former employees and even certain types of independent contractors who work closely with a covered company.

  2. Type of Disclosure: The disclosure must relate to conduct that the whistleblower reasonably believes constitutes a violation of federal securities laws, any rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or any provision of federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. Examples of such violations include accounting fraud, insider trading, bribery, and misrepresentation of financial information.

  3. Reasonable Belief: The whistleblower must have a reasonable belief that the reported conduct violates the aforementioned laws or regulations. This doesn’t require absolute certainty, but rather a credible basis for suspecting wrongdoing.

  4. Reporting Channels: The disclosure must be made to a “protected entity” or “protected individual.” Protected entities include federal regulatory or law enforcement agencies, members or committees of Congress, and persons with supervisory authority over the employee. Protected individuals are those who have the authority to investigate, discover, or terminate misconduct.

  5. Timeliness: Complaints must be filed with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within 180 days of the alleged retaliatory action or the date when the employee became aware of the violation.

What Protections are Afforded?

SOX provides robust protections for whistleblowers who meet the eligibility criteria. These protections include:

  • Anti-Retaliation: SOX prohibits covered companies from retaliating against whistleblowers for engaging in protected activities. Retaliation can take many forms, such as termination, demotion, harassment, denial of benefits, or blacklisting.

  • Reinstatement: If a whistleblower is terminated or otherwise adversely affected due to whistleblowing, they may be entitled to reinstatement to their former position with the same seniority status.

  • Back Pay: Whistleblowers who experience financial losses due to retaliation may be entitled to back pay, including wages, bonuses, and other benefits they would have earned had they not been retaliated against.

  • Compensatory Damages: Whistleblowers may be eligible for compensatory damages for any special damages incurred as a result of the retaliation, such as medical expenses or legal fees.

  • Punitive Damages: In cases of particularly egregious retaliation, punitive damages may be awarded to punish the employer and deter future misconduct.

  • Attorney’s Fees and Costs: Whistleblowers who prevail in their claims may be reimbursed for reasonable attorney’s fees and costs associated with their legal proceedings.

Filing a Complaint

Employees who believe they have been retaliated against can file a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The complaint must be filed within 180 days of the alleged retaliatory action. OSHA investigates the complaint and can order remedies if it finds merit.

Legal Precedents

Several legal precedents have clarified SOX whistleblower protections:
  • Sylvester v. Parexel International LLC: The Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) emphasized that an employee does not need to show that the reported conduct actually violated the law, but only that they reasonably believed it did. This ruling underscored broad protection to encourage reporting of potential fraud. 
  • Wiest v. Lynch: The Third Circuit Court of Appeals reiterated that the reasonable belief standard is objective and does not require the whistleblower to be correct about the misconduct. The court emphasized broad interpretation to fulfill SOX’s purpose of preventing corporate fraud.
Find the Help You Need
If you have important information about fraud, please contact us TODAY